1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 279 A.D.
  5. 279 A.D. 405 (1952)
 

EHNES v. KRINSKY

279 A.D. 405 (1952)

Fred C. Ehnes, Appellant, v. Rae Krinsky et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 26, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Paul Goldman of counsel (Hugo I. Evans with him on the brief; Goldman, Evans & Goldman, attorneys), for appellant.

Abraham Kaplan of counsel (Abraham Kaplan, attorney for Rae Krinsky, respondent; Jacob M. Goldman, attorney for Hattie Kaplan, respondent), for respondents.

PECK, P. J., VAN VOORHIS, SHIENTAG and BERGAN, JJ., concur.

CALLAHAN, J.

The complaint of plaintiff in this action to set aside a fraudulent transfer of property has been dismissed upon the ground that the moneys transferred were exempt from the claim of creditors under subdivision 1 of section 166 of the Insurance Law. The moneys involved were the proceeds of a matured policy of life insurance obtained by defendant Krinsky on the life of her former husband. The policy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases