1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 200 Md.
  5. 200 Md. 360 (1952)
 

KIKAS v. BALTIMORE COUNTY

[No. 196, October Term, 1951.]

200 Md. 360 (1952)

89 A.2d 625

KIKAS ET UX. v. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BALTIMORE COUNTY ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 13, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Richard Smalkin, with whom were Smalkin & Hessian on the brief, for the appellants.

James A. Pine, County Solicitor for Baltimore County, with whom was Walter R. Haile, Assistant County Solicitor, on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before MARBURY, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ.

MARBURY, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case originated on the equity side of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County by the filing of a bill of complaint by the appellants against the appellees. The case comes to us in a somewhat confused state, owing to the unusual method of procedure adopted by the appellees. They filed a demurrer to the bill, which was overruled. They failed to file an answer, and a decree pro confesso was taken against them. Thereupon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases