1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 109 F.Supp.
  5. 109 F.Supp. 444 (1952)
 

DYER v. MacDOUGALL

C. 11011.

109 F.Supp. 444 (1952)

DYER v. MacDOUGALL et al.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

March 4, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Breed, Abbott & Morgan, New York City (Charles H. Tuttle, New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

Moss & Wels, New York City (Richard H. Wels, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

KENNEDY, District Judge.

This is an application for reargument of a motion for summary judgment made by the defendants and also for the allowance of additional time to appeal. Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. rule 73, 28 U.S.C.A.

The action is for damages for defamation; jurisdiction is grounded on diversity of citizenship. By an order dated January 7, 1952, I granted summary judgment in favor of defendants on the third and fourth causes of action. Briefly restated, my...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases