MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES v. THOR CORP.


17 N.J. Super. 505 (1952)

86 A.2d 293

MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. THOR CORPORATION, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AND TELDISCO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided January 25, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Alfred C. Clapp for the plaintiff (Messrs. Ruback, Albach & Weisman, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Brogan for the defendant Thor Corporation.

Messrs. Kapelsohn. Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, attorneys for the defendant Teldisco, Inc.


FREUND, J.S.C.

The issue for consideration is this: Should an order dismissing plaintiff's complaint with prejudice be vacated under Rule 3:60-2 because of counsel's mistake of law? The answer depends upon the determination of (1) the effect of the dismissal of the complaint with prejudice, and (2) whether counsel's mistake of law is the kind of mistake contemplated by the rule.

The facts of this litigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases