1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 112 Cal.App.2d
  5. 112 Cal.App.2d 399 (1952)
 

RIPLING v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 19079.

112 Cal.App.2d 399 (1952)

247 P.2d 117

MILDRED RIPLING et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents; RICHARD NORTON, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

July 24, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard B. Cohen for Petitioners.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, for Respondents.

Cantillon & Glover and McGinley & Hanson for Real Party in Interest.

SHINN, P.J.

Mildred Ripling and William J. Ripling seek a peremptory writ prohibiting respondent court from proceeding without a jury in the case of Norton v. Ripling (L.A. Super. Ct. No. 556274). It is not questioned that prohibition is a proper remedy.

On February 25, 1949, Richard Norton, as guardian of the estate of Thomas J. Norton, incompetent, filed an action against Mildred Ripling, sister...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases