1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 22 N.J.
  5. 22 N.J. Super. 463 (1952)
 

DE CARO v. DE CARO

22 N.J. Super. 463 (1952)

92 A.2d 97

THOMAS J. DE CARO, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FRANK DE CARO, ALSO KNOWN AS FORTUNATO DE CARO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 5, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Mr. Morris Pashman, attorney).

Mr. Ralph W. Chandless argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Chandless, Weller, Kramer & Frank, attorneys).

Before Judges FREUND, STANTON and CONLON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, S.J.A.D.

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying specific performance of an agreement entered into between them and the defendant, on the ground that the consideration was inadequate. There is no dispute as to the material facts.

Anna De Caro died on April 18, 1950, survived by three children, the plaintiffs herein, and by her husband, the defendant. At...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases