1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 104 F.Supp.
  5. 104 F.Supp. 374 (1952)
 

WRENCH v. UNIVERSAL PICTURES CO.

104 F.Supp. 374 (1952)

WRENCH v. UNIVERSAL PICTURES CO., Inc. et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 18, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul, Weiss, Rifkin, Wharton & Garrison, New York City (Samuel J. Silverman and Richard H. Paul, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Adolph Schimel, New York City (Charles S. Rosenschein and Murray H. Warschauer, New York City, of counsel), for defendant Universal.

Stern & Reubens, New York City (Dodd, Mead, Arthur E. Farmer, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

RYAN, Judge.

Plaintiff and both defendants have moved separately for summary judgment contending that as to their respective right to such relief there are no factual issues requiring trial. Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.

The claims asserted by plaintiff are for moneys she alleges are due her from defendant, Universal, under a written contract made on April 22, 1948.

By this contract plaintiff sold to Universal all motion picture rights for the entire...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases