1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 108 F.Supp.
  5. 108 F.Supp. 338 (1952)
 

BRADFORD v. HARDING

Civ. No. 12935.

108 F.Supp. 338 (1952)

BRADFORD v. HARDING et al.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

November 14, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. F. W. Wildermuth, New York City, for plaintiff, appearing specially.

Frank J. Parker, U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., Irving P. Kartell, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., for defendants.

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a plaintiff's motion to remand to the Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Queens, on the ground that the petition is inadequate in ten specified respects, most of which go to its legal sufficiency. The action is against fifty-four defendants, among whom are John F. X. McGohey, Irving H. Saypol, Irving R. Kaufman, Thomas F. Burchill, Jr., James E. Mulcahy, Edward W. McDonald and Emmet E. Harding, and concerning whom and other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases