1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 21 N.J.
  5. 21 N.J. Super. 356 (1952)
 

DeMARCO v. ESTLOW

21 N.J. Super. 356 (1952)

91 A.2d 272

ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 22, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James D. Stockwell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink, attorneys).

Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and SMALLEY.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Haneman in his opinion filed in the Chancery Division and reported in 18 N.J.Super. 30

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases