1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 9 N.J.
  5. 9 N.J. 336 (1952)
 

LEIMANN v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CRANFORD TP.

9 N.J. 336 (1952)

88 A.2d 337

RONALD R. LEIMANN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, UNION COUNTY, NEW JERSEY; NICHOLAS TOMASULO, ELIZABETH TOMASULO, JOSEPH P. TOMASULO AND GRACE TOMASULO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 5, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Ira D. Dorian argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Ellsworth J. Sterner argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., J.

Determining that "by reason of the exceptional and peculiar shape of the premises and by reason of non-access to the rear of said premises," the strict application of the municipal zoning ordinance would result in undue hardship upon defendant owners, the Board of Adjustment of the Township of Cranford granted a variance permitting the construction of a garden-type apartment project of eight buildings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases