1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 20 N.J.
  5. 20 N.J. Super. 11 (1952)
 

GORDETSKY v. COHEN

20 N.J. Super. 11 (1952)

89 A.2d 84

SADYE GORDETSKY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM COHEN, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 19, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph W. Jantausch argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Milton C. Yarrow, attorney).

Mr. Jack L. Cohen argued the cause for the appellants.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

This action is governed, and affirmance of the judgment required, by Tappin's Jewelry Stores v. Rosner, 111 N.J.L. 301 (E. & A. 1933). There the plaintiff had made a conditional sale of a diamond ring and the buyer had pawned the ring. Then when the plaintiff brought its action to recover possession of the ring, the defendant pawnbroker asserted that L. 1931, c. 294, gave...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases