1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 105 F.Supp.
  5. 105 F.Supp. 187 (1952)
 

HINTZ v. AUSTENAL LABORATORIES

Civ. 12536.

105 F.Supp. 187 (1952)

HINTZ et al. v. AUSTENAL LABORATORIES, Inc.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

May 12, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Corcoran & Kostelanetz, New York City, for plaintiffs, (by Rexford E. Tompkins, New York City).

Alexander & Ash, New York City, for defendant, (by Edward Ash, New York City).

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a defendant's motion to transfer this cause sounding in tort, to the Southern District, upon the ground that venue does not lie in the Eastern District, since the defendant, a New York corporation, has its only place of business in the Borough of Manhattan, Southern District, and none in any county in the Eastern District. That is stated in the affidavit of Soller, the vice-president.

The attorney for the defendant, in his affidavit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases