1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 104 F.Supp.
  5. 104 F.Supp. 168 (1952)
 

TITCOMB v. BILLINGS, OLCOTT & CO.

104 F.Supp. 168 (1952)

TITCOMB v. BILLINGS, OLCOTT & CO. et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

March 7, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Remsen Millham & Bowdish, New York City (Richard F. Curran, Damian J. Spellman, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Rathbone, Perry, Kelley & Drye, New York City (Francis S. Bensel, W. Frederick Knecht, New York City, of counsel), for defendants John E. Davis, Thomas H. Hughes and Charles F. Hummel, co-partners doing business under the firm name and style of Billings, Olcott & Co., and John E. Davis, individually.

Battle, Levy, Fowler & Neaman, New York City (Robert E. Hoppman, New York City, of counsel), for defendant B. P. Elebash.

CONGER, District Judge.

This is an action by the plaintiff, as administrator c. t. a. of the goods, chattels and credits left unadministered of George E. Titcomb, deceased, against present and former members of the stockbrokerage firm of Billings, Olcott & Co.

The complaint contains two claims for relief; one for the recovery of moneys and securities belonging to the estate of George E. Titcomb, deceased; another in the alternative, for an accounting for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases