1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 22 N.J.
  5. 22 N.J. Super. 249 (1952)
 

VOLLBEHR v. INGRAM

22 N.J. Super. 249 (1952)

92 A.2d 81

JULES O. VOLLBEHR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SARAH E. INGRAM, CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 27, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Mortimer Neuman argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Benjamin L. Walters, attorney).

Mr. Milton B. Conford argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Stein, Stern & Conford, attorneys).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

The plaintiff, a resident of the State of New York, instituted a stockholder's representative action against the four defendants, A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc., Sarah E. Ingram, Benjamin F. Knopp, and Chemical Industries, Inc. Mrs. Ingram and Knopp are residents of New York; A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc. is a New York corporation, authorized to do business in New Jersey; Chemical Industries...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases