1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 22 N.J.
  5. 22 N.J. Super. 204 (1952)
 

CLOSTERMAN v. TP. OF CRANFORD

22 N.J. Super. 204 (1952)

91 A.2d 646

WILLIAM C. CLOSTERMAN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND THE H.A. WILSON COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 16, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Walter E. Cooper argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. Carl H. Warsinski argued the cause for the respondents Township of Cranford and Township Committee of Cranford.

Mr. C. Allan Phillips argued the cause for the respondent Osceola Homes, Inc. (Messrs. Whiting, Moore & Phillips, attorneys; Mr. Roswell S. Nichols, Jr., of counsel).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and SMALLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SMALLEY, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

This is a zoning case. Plaintiffs contest the validity of an ordinance passed in the Township of Cranford on April 10, 1951 amending its zoning ordinance as to a specific parcel of property whereby the area was rezoned from Residence "A" District to Industrial District. They appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Union County, affirming the action of the defendant township.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases