1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 22 N.J.
  5. 22 N.J. Super. 155 (1952)
 

LAMPERT v. MIKOS

22 N.J. Super. 155 (1952)

91 A.2d 577

IRVING LAMPERT, DAVID LAMPERT, SAMUEL LAMPERT AND IRVING LAMPERT, ADMINISTRATOR C.T.A. OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH LAMPERT, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. LANISLAUS MIKOS AND ELIZABETH MIKOS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 21, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lewis Winetsky argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Harry Mopsick, attorney).

Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Seymour S. Lichtenstein, attorney).

Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, S.J.A.D.

A mere sketch of the significant characteristics of this litigation will adequately supply the background of the points debated and serve to accelerate the announcement of our conclusions.

The plaintiffs and the defendants are the owners respectively of adjacent parcels of land situate on the southerly side of St. George Avenue, in Linden. The plaintiffs complained that the defendants were depriving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases