1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 11 N.J.
  5. 11 N.J. 144 (1952)
 

UNITED ADVERTISING CORP. v. BOROUGH OF RARITAN

11 N.J. 144 (1952)

93 A.2d 362

UNITED ADVERTISING CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF RARITAN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 22, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Mortimer Eisner argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Arthur J. Sullivan, Jr., on the brief).

Mr. Raymond Del Tufo, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys; Mr. Vincent P. Biunno on the brief).

Mr. Albert S. Bard filed a brief amicus curiae for the New Jersey Roadside Council.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., J.

The Billboard Act of 1930, imposing annual license and permit fees upon those in the business of outdoor advertising who locate and maintain billboards and other structures for outdoor advertising, was revised and supplanted by the Billboard Act of 1942, but, while carrying forward many of the provisions of the former law, expanding upon some and adding new matter, the 1942 law does not include...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases