1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 279 A.D.
  5. 279 A.D. 1019 (1952)
 

POMERANTZ v. SUSSMAN

279 A.D. 1019 (1952)

Jacob M. Pomerantz, Appellant, v. Emanuel Sussman et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of County Seat Sales Co., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 14, 1952.

Amended judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, without prejudice to defendants Fragola making an application, if they be so advised, to amend their answer.

Plaintiff may testify to his negotiations with his customer, though in the absence of the seller, to show that he was the procuring cause of the sale. (Melkon v. Kirk & Co., 232 App. Div. 134; Meyers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases