Claimant was employed in various capacities, as a fireman, separator man and creameryman. It has been found that he sustained accidental injuries, on two different occasions, which arose out of and in the course of his employment. The proof as to his injuries, and their connection with his employment, is so vague that it does not rise to the level of substantial evidence.
Award reversed on the law, with costs to appellants and against the Workmen's Compensation Board...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.