1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 97 F.Supp.
  5. 97 F.Supp. 2 (1951)
 

RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP. v. THE PUEBLO

97 F.Supp. 2 (1951)

RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP. v. THE PUEBLO et al. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION v. THE WATERTOWN et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 8, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving H. Saypol, U. S. Atty., New York City, for libelant, Edward L. Smith, New York City, advocate.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, New York City, for respondent Gulf Oil Corp. Burton H. White, Herbert M. Lord, New York City, advocates.

Nash, Ten Eyck, Maximov & Freehill, New York City, for claimant-respondent Cities Service Oil Co. Eli Ellis, J. Newton Nash, New York City, advocates.

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The respondents in both of these actions have excepted to the libels and ask their dismissal on the ground that these suits are actually brought by and for the United States through an instrumentality of the United States against the United States through respondents as agents. The respondents cite as their authority Defense Supplies Corp. v. United States Lines Co., 2 Cir., 1945, 148 F.2d 311. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases