One issue raised is that claimant was an independent contractor. He was a roofer by trade but had no shop of his own. He testified himself that he did not work under a contract but was employed by the day for a daily wage. The alleged employer supplied all of the material and equipment used on the roofing work claimant was engaged in when he was injured. Appellant asserted that claimant was his partner but the board rejected this contention. At most only a question of fact...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.