HAAS v. ROSENBLUM FURS, INC.


278 A.D. 685 (1951)

William Haas, Respondent, v. Rosenblum Furs, Inc., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 20, 1951.


Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the motion for summary judgment denied.

Plaintiff, who has full knowledge of the circumstances under which the trade acceptance sued upon was issued, has elected in his motion for summary judgment to rest upon a presumption of consideration without disclosing the facts, as against the lack of knowledge of those required to defend in behalf of the defendant. The question they have raised as to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases