HAMMOND v. WESTOVER

No. 12031.

97 F.Supp. 753 (1951)

HAMMOND v. WESTOVER.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

February 23, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hill, Farrer & Burrill and Carl A. Stutsman, Jr., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Ernest A. Tolin, U. S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell, Edward R. McHale, Asst. U. S. Attys., Eugene Harpole and Frank Mahoney, Sp. Atty. Bureau of Internal Revenue, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.


YANKWICH, District Judge.

The above-entitled cause, heretofore tried, argued and submitted, is hereby decided as follows:

(1) Judgment will be for the plaintiff as prayed for in the Complaint, the exact amount of the judgment to be computed by counsel according to Local Rule 7(b).

(2) Judgment will be for the Defendant on the Complaint of the Government for intervention that plaintiff take nothing.

Findings and judgment to be prepared by counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases