Per Curiam:
It sufficiently appears from defendant's proposed amendment to his amended answer to the second amended complaint, and from his affidavit on the cross motion, that defendant does not dispute that his attorney, Sidney B. Alexander, had authority to act for him in the phases of this controversy in respect of which he has purported to act for defendant. Regardless of whether the arrangement set forth in the letter from defendant's said attorney to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.