1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 95 F.Supp.
  5. 95 F.Supp. 740 (1951)
 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA v. AMERICAN EXP. CO.

95 F.Supp. 740 (1951)

REPUBLIC OF CHINA et al. v. AMERICAN EXP. CO., Inc.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 24, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burke & Burke, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Carter, Ledyard & Milburn, New York City, for defendant.

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

The pleadings herein disclose allegations in the complaint and admissions, denials, a defense and a counterclaim in the answer as follows: allegations that (a) the National Government at Formosa is the lawful government of the Republic of China, and (b) Directorate General of Postal Remittances and Savings Bank is a department of the postal system of said Government; to which allegations defendant pleads lack of knowledge or information sufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases