1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 207 Ga.
  5. 207 Ga. 599 (1951)
 

HART v. STATE

17358.

207 Ga. 599 (1951)

63 S.E.2d 390

HART v. THE STATE.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

February 12, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T. O. Hathcock and J. W. LeCraw, for plaintiff in error.

Paul Webb, Solicitor-General, William Hall, and Ogden Doremus, contra.

WYATT, Justice.

1. The general grounds of the motion for new trial are not argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error. In the oral argument, there was some reference made to the contention that the judgment of conviction should be reversed for the reason that it appeared that the prosecutrix and the defendant were engaged in the operation of a farm on a partnership basis; and that, since the money alleged to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases