1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 366 Pa.
  5. 366 Pa. 385 (1951)
 

LaCOURSE v. KIESEL

366 Pa. 385 (1951)

LaCourse v. Kiesel, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 2, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin F. Papish, for appellants.

Donald W. Hedges, with him Russell Conwell Cooney and Mancill, Cooney, Ott & Semans, for appellees.

Before DREW, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, LADNER and CHIDSEY, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE LADNER, January 2, 1951:

From the findings of the learned chancellor supported by adequate evidence and approved by the court en banc, we state the following facts: The defendants, Anna M. Kiesel, William Kiesel, Jr., and Ruth R. Kiesel, hereinafter referred to as individual defendants, being owners of premises 101 Montgomery Avenue, Bala Cynwyd, Pa., engaged Louis Traiman Auction Company of Pa., hereinafter referred to as Traiman Company, to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases