MASCHMEIJER v. INGRAM


97 F.Supp. 639 (1951)

MASCHMEIJER et al. v. INGRAM et al. MASCHMEIJER et al. v. A. MASCHMEIJER, Jr., Inc.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

May 22, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for plaintiffs, Joseph L. Broderick, New York City, of counsel.

Mitchell, Capron, Marsh, Angulo & Cooney, New York City, for defendants other than Jules O. Vollbehr.

Benjamin A. Walters, New York City, for Jules O. Vollbehr.


McGOHEY, District Judge.

The Court has before it a series of motions in two actions between essentially the same parties. The motions involved in the second action will be considered first. They are plaintiff's motions directed to the answer and defendants' motion to compel a reply to affirmative defenses.

The Motions Directed to the Answer.

The complaint here asserts six claims or causes of action in an action which plaintiff's memorandum characterizes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases