1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 96 F.Supp.
  5. 96 F.Supp. 597 (1951)
 

DUNN v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

Civ. No. 26936.

96 F.Supp. 597 (1951)

DUNN v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

January 5, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter B. Betras, W. Carlton Young, Youngstown, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Harrington, Huxley & Smith — Norman A. Emery, Youngstown, Ohio, for defendant.

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is an action for damages for personal injury.

Defendant on December 9, 1949, served plaintiff with 22 interrogatories which to date have not been answered. Defendant, therefore, moves to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 37(d), 28 U.S.C.A.

This rule speaks in terms of willful failure to answer, and it is not apparent that there has been a willful failure in this action. It was removed from a Common Pleas...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases