1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 110 F.Supp.
  5. 110 F.Supp. 548 (1951)
 

DANIELS v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.

No. 12506-BH.

110 F.Supp. 548 (1951)

DANIELS et al. v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.

United States District Court S. D. California, C. D.

April 30, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arch E. Ekdale, San Pedro, Cal. and John F. McCarthy, Long Beach, Cal., for plaintiff.

Hindman & Davis, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.

HARRISON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action for a loss which they allege was covered by the extended coverage rider on a fire insurance policy issued by the defendant through its agent.

The amount of the loss is not in dispute.

Two questions of fact are presented to me for decision as follows:

1. Was the loss caused by an explosion within the meaning of the extended coverage rider attached to the insurance policy?

2. Did...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases