1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 100 F.Supp.
  5. 100 F.Supp. 493 (1951)
 

DOW v. CARNEGIE-ILLINOIS STEEL CORP.

Civ. A. No. 5153.

100 F.Supp. 493 (1951)

DOW v. CARNEGIE-ILLINOIS STEEL CORP.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

September 19, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hymen Schlesinger, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Ira R. Hill (of Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay), Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

BURNS, District Judge.

The instant motion for a new trial asserts four principal grounds, each of which will be considered briefly.

First, plaintiff contends that the manner of selection of the jury panel constitutes prejudicial error. I concur in full in the statements and conclusions of Judge Gourley, whose opinion disposing of that assignment of error is being filed contemporaneously with this opinion. D.C., 100 F.Supp. 494

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases