1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 95 F.Supp.
  5. 95 F.Supp. 467 (1951)
 

APPLICATION OF ROGOFF

No. 113, Miscellaneous.

95 F.Supp. 467 (1951)

Application of ROGOFF.

United States District Court M. D. Pennsylvania.

February 13, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George M. Szabad, and Blum & Jolles, all of New York City, Hugh J. McMenamin, and O'Malley, Harris, Harris & Warren, all of Scranton, Pa., for petitioner.

Marshall M. Holcombe, and Curtis, Morris & Safford, all of New York City, George H. Hafer, Hull, Leiby and Metzger, all of Harrisburg, Pa., for respondents.

WATSON, Chief Judge.

Petitioner, Julian Rogoff, moved, prior to this, for an order compelling Respondents, William S. Watts and Franklin H. Wells, to answer certain questions propounded to them in depositions being taken in Interference No. 83,667, now pending in the United States Patent Office. On December 14, 1950, this Court filed an opinion and an order denying Petitioner's motion. D.C., 94 F.Supp. 377. Petitioner now files...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases