1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 11 N.J.
  5. 11 N.J. Super. 528 (1951)
 

BRANDT v. THE GREAT A. & P. TEA CO.

11 N.J. Super. 528 (1951)

78 A.2d 598

JESSIE BRANDT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 8, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph Tomaselli argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Edwin Segal, attorney; Mr. Joseph P. De Luca, of counsel).

Mr. William G. Bischoff argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Carroll, Taylor & Bischoff, attorneys).

Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by ROGERS, J.A.D.

Plaintiff sought damages for injuries sustained in a fall allegedly the result of defendant's negligent maintenance of an automobile parking area adjacent to its store. At the close of the testimony the trial court held that the evidence presented no issues for the jury to determine and granted defendant's motion for judgment from which this appeal is taken.

In passing upon a motion for judgment, heretofore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases