1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 100 F.Supp.
  5. 100 F.Supp. 437 (1951)
 

UNITED MEAT CO. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP.

Civ. A. Nos. 2089-47, 2090-47.

100 F.Supp. 437 (1951)

UNITED MEAT CO., Inc. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP. FEDERATED MEAT CORP. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

October 3, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert I. Schmalholz, New York City, Byron N. Scott, Washington, D. C., William Sardell, Louis Katz, New York City, for plaintiffs.

George Arthur Fruit, Newell A. Clapp, Joseph M. Friedman, and George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for defendant.

PINE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, who were meat slaughterers, filed these actions to obtain meat subsidy payments authorized by the Emergency Price Control Act of 19421 and Directive 41, Office of Economic Stabilization.2

Defendant, by answer, alleged that plaintiffs had violated Maximum Price Regulation 574, Office of Price Administration, during and prior to the periods for which plaintiffs sought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases