1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 8 N.J.
  5. 8 N.J. 40 (1951)
 

BAZINSKY v. CONKLIN

8 N.J. 40 (1951)

83 A.2d 705

IDA BAZINSKY, JOSEPH BAZINSKY AND MORRIS GOLDBERG, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. NELSON CONKLIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 15, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Abraham I. Harkavy argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Harkavy & Lieb, attorneys).

Mr. William R. Morris argued the cause for the respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

This is a civil action sounding in tort, grounded in the alleged actionable negligence of the defendant, Nelson Conklin, in the operation of his automobile. The suit was instituted against him by Ida Bazinsky, Joseph Bazinsky and Morris Goldberg, plaintiffs, in the Law Division of the Essex County Court and, after a trial to court and jury, terminated in a verdict in favor of the defendant. The trial court, on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases