1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 95 F.Supp.
  5. 95 F.Supp. 323 (1951)
 

HALL LABORATORIES v. NATIONAL ALUMINATE CORP.

Civ. No. 1192.

95 F.Supp. 323 (1951)

HALL LABORATORIES, Inc., et al. v. NATIONAL ALUMINATE CORP.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

January 22, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aaron Finger and Robert H. Richards, Jr., (of Richards, Layton & Finger), of Wilmington, Del., and Walter J. Blenko and James K. Everhart, Jr. (of Blenko, Hoopes, Leonard & Glenn), of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Arthur G. Connolly, of Wilmington, Del., John T. Chadwell, Victor P. Kayser and Richard L. Johnston, all of Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

LEAHY, Chief Judge.

Defendant's motion for summary judgment was denied. D.C., 93 F.Supp. 376. It was there suggested if the Fink-Richardson patent and plaintiffs' practices do not correspond with the teachings of the Fresenius text the prayers of the complaint at bar should be denied. Defendant contends that a finding in its favor on this issue will be dispositive of the case.

In addition, defendant repeats its contention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases