1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 368 Pa.
  5. 368 Pa. 21 (1951)
 

ZEBLEY v. OSTHEIMER

368 Pa. 21 (1951)

Zebley, Appellant, v. Ostheimer.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Reargued May 24, 1951.

June 27, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph W. Henderson, with him J. Welles Henderson, Jr., George M. Brodhead and Rawle & Henderson, for appellant.

John R. Young, with him James F. McMullan, William H. Steeble, G. Selden Pitt and Clark, Brown, McCown, Fortenbaugh & Young, for appellee.

Before DREW, C.J., STERN, STEARNE, JONES, BELL, LADNER and CHIDSEY, JJ.

OPINION PER CURIAM, June 27, 1951:

Ordinarily, in a partnership dissolution, the withdrawing partner is entitled to a full accounting of all the assets and earnings of the partnership, though of course the valuation extent and amount of the share payable to him is governed by the terms of dissolution as provided in the partnership agreement.

Here the court below endeavored to set up a formula gleaned from the agreement and so control the scope of the accounting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases