1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 17 N.J.
  5. 17 N.J. Super. 20 (1951)
 

TUMARKIN v. FRIEDMAN

17 N.J. Super. 20 (1951)

85 A.2d 304

ALLAN L. TUMARKIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ADOLPH FRIEDMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND MANUFACTURERS CUTTER CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 21, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Benjamin Gross argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Gross & Gross, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph J. Schotland argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Sandles & Sandles, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, S.J.A.D.

The delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1947 completed their task with high hopes that the modern judicial structure which they erected, when implemented by appropriate court rules, would eliminate the jurisdictional disputes between Law and Chancery and the archaic procedural requirements which had so often frustrated just and expeditious determinations on the ultimate merits. In substantial measure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases