1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 67 S.E.2d
  5. 67 S.E.2d 287 (1951)
 

WIDENHOUSE v. RUSS

No. 377.

67 S.E.2d 287 (1951)

234 N.C. 382

WIDENHOUSE v. RUSS et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 31, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. S. Bogle, Concord, Morton & Williams, Albemarle, Marion B. Morton, Albemarle, for defendant-appellant.

E. Johnston Irvin, Hartsell & Hartsell, Concord, for plaintiff-appellee.

WINBORNE, Justice.

The first assignment of error presented by appellant, based upon her exception to the ruling of the trial court in striking out all of paragraphs two, three and five of her further answer and defense is well taken.

While the averments in paragraphs two and three are in the main evidentiary, they were not stricken for that cause. And the averments in paragraph five are sufficient to constitute a denial that she was indebted to defendant Russ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases