1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 105 F.Supp.
  5. 105 F.Supp. 247 (1951)
 

SURELINE MFG. CO. v. MARZALL

Civ. No. 2044-49.

105 F.Supp. 247 (1951)

SURELINE MFG. CO. v. MARZALL, Commissioner of Patents.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

October 10, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lloyd C. Root, of Spencer, Johnston, Cook & Root, Chicago, Ill., and John W. Nairn, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Samuel W. Cochran, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

The plaintiff seeks to compel the Commissioner of Patents to register the trademark "Sureline", which the plaintiff uses in connection with certain automobile ignition parts. The registration was asked for under the Trade-Mark Act of 1905, now 15 U.S.C.A. § 1051 et seq., which was still in existence when the proceeding was instituted. Registration was refused on the ground of possibility of confusion with the trade-mark "Sparkline",...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases