1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 12 N.J.
  5. 12 N.J. Super. 320 (1951)
 

STATE v. MARTINEK

12 N.J. Super. 320 (1951)

79 A.2d 697

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH MARTINEK AND WALTER MARTINEK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 14, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Paul T. Huckin argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Francis V.D. Lloyd, attorney).

Mr. Albert S. Gross argued the cause for the defendants-appellants.

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

The defendants were convicted of the crime known as "bookmaking" in violation of R.S. 2:135-3, as amended, L. 1940. Their asserted grounds for reversal are: (1) the erroneous admission of a "card, betting slips and two letters" and (2) the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

The alleged bookmaking was conducted at the premises of the defendant Joseph Martinek, 151 Washington...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases