1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 12 N.J.
  5. 12 N.J. Super. 20 (1951)
 

TICE v. BOROUGH OF WOODCLIFF LAKE

12 N.J. Super. 20 (1951)

78 A.2d 825

ROY H. TICE AND FRANK H. TICE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOROUGH OF WOODCLIFF LAKE, IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 13, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. G.W.C. McCarter argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Freeman & Kroner, attorneys).

Mr. Horace F. Banta argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Winne & Banta, attorneys. Mr. Edward G. Evertz, on the brief).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from the adverse judgment entered against them in the Law Division, Bergen County, in this action in lieu of mandamus to require defendants to issue a building permit to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs proposed to build in the Borough of Woodcliff Lake a swimming pool open to the public, to be 400 feet long and 85 feet wide, with bath houses and a refreshment stand, and to equip...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases