1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 15 N.J.
  5. 15 N.J. Super. 266 (1951)
 

HEYMAN v. BISHOP

15 N.J. Super. 266 (1951)

83 A.2d 344

ERNEST F. HEYMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACOB BISHOP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 11, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Howard K. Stokes (Messrs. Wise & Wise, attorneys) argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. David Goldstein (Messrs. Goldstein & Novogrod, attorneys) argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges COLIE, GRIMSHAW and HARTSHORNE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLIE, J.S.C.

The plaintiff, Ernest F. Heyman, instituted a suit in the Monmouth County District Court seeking a declaratory judgment. There is no dispute as to the following facts. The plaintiff is a tenant in Apartment No. 3 in an apartment house in Red Bank owned by the defendant. The last lease for Apartment No. 3 was for one year, commencing October 1, 1947 and expiring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases