1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 191 Or.
  5. 191 Or. 76 (1951)
 

BUTENSHON v. SHOESMITH ET AL.

191 Or. 76 (1951)

228 P.2d 462

BUTENSHON v. SHOESMITH ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed March 7, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Kilkenny argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Raley, Kilkenny & Raley, of Pendleton.

W.C. Perry argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Randall, Perry & Wells, of Pendleton.

Before LUSK, Chief Justice, and BRAND, ROSSMAN, HAY, LATOURETTE and WARNER, Justices.

REVERSED.

LUSK, J.

The plaintiff, E.M. Butenshon, sued the defendant and appellant, Ivan A. Shoesmith, and the defendant, Beldon Hall, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff when he was struck by an automobile operated by the defendant Hall. There was a verdict and judgment against both defendants from which Shoesmith alone has appealed.

The sufficiency of the evidence of Hall's negligence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases