1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 99 F.Supp.
  5. 99 F.Supp. 161 (1951)
 

BOWDLE v. AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. OF HARTFORD

Civ. A. No. 1312.

99 F.Supp. 161 (1951)

BOWDLE v. AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. OF HARTFORD.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

June 8, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Morford, William H. Bennethum, Morford, Bennethum, Marvel & Cooch, of Wilmington, Del., and Max Terry, of Dover, Del., for plaintiff.

Rodney M. Layton, Richards, Layton & Finger, of Wilmington, Del., and J. Welles Henderson, Rawle & Henderson, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

RODNEY, District Judge.

This case is before the court upon plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The complaint sets forth four causes of action. The fourth cause of action seeks a reformation of the policy of insurance upon which the action is brought. The reformation of the instrument which is thus sought affects principally the "lay-up warranty" clause of the policy, which clause is also and particularly pertinent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases