1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 95 F.Supp.
  5. 95 F.Supp. 160 (1951)
 

APEL v. CONNOLLY

Civ. A. No. 136-50.

95 F.Supp. 160 (1951)

APEL v. CONNOLLY.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

January 22, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward I. Baker, Atlantic City, N. J., for plaintiff.

Nathan Goldberg, Atlantic City, N. J., for defendant.

MADDEN, District Judge.

This matter was tried by the court without a jury and is a suit by plaintiff, Arno A. Apel, against defendant, Frank R. Connolly, for an injunction, together with accounting and damages for infringement of a patent owned by plaintiff. Defendant admits infringement and the damages have been stipulated, but validity of plaintiff's patent is contested upon the grounds of anticipation in two prior patents.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases