1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 101 F.Supp.
  5. 101 F.Supp. 100 (1951)
 

PIKE v. UNITED STATES

Civ. 2941.

101 F.Supp. 100 (1951)

PIKE v. UNITED STATES.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

August 15, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter W. Walsh, John J. Sullivan, New Haven, Conn., Kenneth Ray, New York City, for plaintiff.

Adrian W. Maher, U. S. Atty., New Haven, Conn., Edward J. Lonergan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Hartford, Conn., Fred Rita, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

HINCKS, Chief Judge.

At the close of the trial herein, I requested the plaintiff to submit proposed findings and conclusions. This was done and the parties have addressed briefs to the findings and conclusions thus proposed. In its brief, the defendant has not questioned the proposed findings and my study of the record satisfies me that the findings as proposed are indeed required by the proofs. I therefore adopt them...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases