1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 101 F.Supp.
  5. 101 F.Supp. 81 (1951)
 

HOOK v. HOOK & ACKERMAN, INC.

Civ. 7990.

101 F.Supp. 81 (1951)

HOOK et al. v. HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

November 20, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Charles L. Cunningham, Pittsburgh, Pa., Harry Price, New York City, for defendant.

STEWART, District Judge.

On July 19, 1949, plaintiffs brought this action seeking a declaration that the "Hook & Miller" boiler embodies none of the inventions covered by patent No. 2247796 and that therefore the patent is not being infringed by them. In addition, plaintiffs prayed in their complaint that the defendant corporation and its agents be enjoined from asserting, contending, claiming, or alleging that plaintiffs' boiler infringes the patent, and from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases