1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 6 N.J.
  5. 6 N.J. 117 (1951)
 

BACON v. BACON

6 N.J. 117 (1951)

77 A.2d 802

MARY G. BACON, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS BACON & GRAHAM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. JACOB D. BACON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 2, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph M. Jacobs argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant and cross-respondent. Mr. David Stoffer on the brief. (Messrs. Stoffer & Jacobs, attorneys.)

Mr. Jack Rinzler argued the cause for defendant-respondent and cross-appellant. (Messrs. Feder & Rinzler, attorneys.)

The opinion of the court was delivered by CASE, J.

The litigation is between wife and husband. It concerns a paper and twine business conducted under the name of Bacon & Graham, and, on the counterclaim, title to real estate.

The wife, Mary G. Bacon, filed a complaint in the former Court of Chancery alleging that she was the owner of the business and that her husband, Jacob D. Bacon, the defendant, was employed by her as a salesman and was seeking to seize...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases