1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 8 N.J.
  5. 8 N.J. 103 (1951)
 

A.C. SCHULTES & SONS v. HADDON TP.

8 N.J. 103 (1951)

83 A.2d 896

A.C. SCHULTES & SONS, A PARTNERSHIP CONSISTING OF A.C. SCHULTES, SR., A.C. SCHULTES, JR., JAMES F. SCHULTES AND MARY E. SCHULTES, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF HADDON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT, LAYNE-NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 29, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph B. Perskie argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Perskie & Perskie, attorneys).

Mr. John Milton, Jr., argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Lynwood Lord and Messrs. Milton, McNulty & Augelli, attorneys; Mr. William Bannon, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

The query here is whether or not a contract with a municipality for the construction and drilling of deep wells for increased water supply, at a cost exceeding $1,000, comes within the statutory requirements providing for advertisement and the awarding of the contract to the lowest bidder.

The Township of Haddon needed an additional water supply and accordingly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases